[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
The Iranian Society of Islamic History
..
index
isc
noormags
magiran
sid
google scholar
virascience
academia
linked in
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 59 (autumn 2025) ::
islamhistory 2025, 1(59): 5-8 Back to browse issues page
Critique of the Claim of Duality in the Conduct of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in Mecca and Medina Based on a Revelation-Oriented Understanding of the Qur’an
Yaqub Tabesh * , Farzad Dehghani
Abstract:   (42 Views)
This study critically examines one of the most controversial Western interpretations of early Islamic history, namely, the view of William Montgomery Watt regarding the alleged duality in the personality of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). By distinguishing between the Meccan and Medinan periods, Watt argues that the Prophet was a messenger of morality and compassion in Mecca but transformed in Medina into a political statesman who resorted to violence and warfare in order to consolidate power. The present study responds to this claim through an analysis based on the chronological progression of Qur’anic revelation and demonstrates that the Holy Qur’an, even after the Hijrah and during the height of the Prophet’s political authority, presents a coherent, compassionate, and peace-oriented image of him. In this research, Watt’s interpretive framework was first extracted and reexamined on the basis of his three major works, Muhammad at Mecca, Muhammad at Medina, and Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman. Subsequently, relying on the chronological order of revelation of Qur’anic verses related to war and peace, the conduct and Qur’anic discourse of the Medinan period were analyzed. The findings were explained at three levels. At the ethical level, they reveal the continuity of such qualities as gentleness, mercy, and forgiveness even at the height of political power. At the discursive level, they demonstrate a persistent emphasis on constructive dialogue, peaceful coexistence, and the prohibition of aggression. At the substantive level, they show that jihad was fundamentally defensive in nature and considered legitimate only in response to oppression and threat. Ultimately, the study concludes that the claim of the Prophet’s inclination toward violence or a fundamental transformation of his character in Medina is incompatible with the Qur’anic worldview. A revelation-oriented analysis of the verses, combined with a three-dimensional ethical, discursive, and substantive approach, provides a reasoned internal critique of Watt’s orientalist assumptions and presents Islam as a religion grounded in mercy, peace, and moral values.
Keywords: Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Militarism, Violence, Peace, Holy Qur’an, Montgomery Watt.
Full-Text [PDF 925 kb]   (15 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/06/29 | Accepted: 2025/09/11
References
1. Abdolmohammadi, Hossein (1391 SH). “Naqd-e Didgah-e Mostashreqan Darbareh Janghaye Payambar-e A'zam (s) ba Roykard-e Qur'ani.” Qur'an Pazhuhi-ye Khavarshenasan. no 13 (Autumn–Winter). p65–86. [In Persian]
2. Abdolmohammadi, Hossein, and Hadi Akbari (1391 SH). “Naqd va Barrasi-ye Didgah-e Mostashreqan Darbareh Ahdaf-e Ghazavat va Saraya-ye Payambar-e A'zam az Manzar-e Asnad-e Tarikhi”. Tarikh-e Islam. no 51 (Autumn). p 7–40. [In Persian]
3. Abdullahi An-Na’im, Ahmed (2006). Why Should Muslims Abandon Jihad? Human Rights and the Future of International Law. No publisher specified.
4. Abu al-Futuh-e Razi, H. ibn A. (1408). Rawd al-Jinan wa Ruh al-Jinan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an. Mashhad: Bonyad-e Pazhuheshhaye Eslami Astan Quds Razavi. [In Persian]
5. Al-Baghawi, H. ibn M. (1420). Ma'alim al-Tanzil fi Tafsir al-Qur'an. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi. [In Arabic]
6. Al-Baydawi, A. ibn 'U. (1418). Anwar al-Tanzil wa Asrar al-Ta'wil. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi. [In Arabic]
7. Al-Din, A. & Taryn, H. (2015). “Revisiting the ‘Red Lines’: When Free Speech, Faith, and Social Change Intersect.” Brookings Institution. [In Arabic]
8. Al-Farahidi, K. ibn A. (1409 AH). Kitab al-'Ayn. Qom: Nashr Hijrat. [In Arabic]
9. Al-Samarqandi, N. ibn M. ibn A. (n.d.). Bahr al-'Ulum. n.p.: n.p. [In Arabic]
10. Al-Suyuti, A. ibn A. B. (1421). Al-Itqan fi 'Ulum al-Qur'an. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-'Arabi. [In Arabic]
11. Al-Tabataba'i, M. H. (1417). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an. Qom: Daftar-e Entesharat-e Eslami. [In Arabic]
12. Al-Tabrisi, F. ibn H. (1408/1372 SH). Majma' al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an (2nd ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah; Tehran: Entesharat Naser Khosrow. [In Arabic]
13. Al-Tha'labi al-Nishaburi, A. I. A. ibn I. (1422 AH). Al-Kashf wa al-Bayan 'an Tafsir al-Qur'an. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi. [In Arabic]
14. Al-Tusi, M. ibn H. (n.d.). Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi. [In Arabic]
15. Al-Waqidi, M. ibn 'U. (1389 SH). Al-Maghazi: Tarikh-e Janghaye Payambar (PBUH). Translated by Mahmoud Mahdavi Damghani. Tehran: Markaz Nashr-e Daneshgahi. [In Persian]
16. Balkhi, Muqatil ibn Sulayman (1423 AH). Tafsir Muqatil ibn Sulayman. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath. [In Arabic]
17. Banooy-e Asfahani, Sayyidah Nusrat Amin. (1361 SH). Makhzan al-'Irfan dar Tafsir-e Qur'an. Tehran: Nahzat-e Zanan-e Mosalman. [In Persian]
18. Burji, Y. A. (1385 SH). “Ta'ammoli dar Ettiham-e Khoshunat be Payambar-e A'zam (PBUH).” Pazhuheshnameh-ye Hikmat va Falsafeh-ye Eslami. No 20. Winter. p19–30. [In Persian]
19. Frankopan, P. (1399 SH). The Silk Roads: A New History of the World. Translated by Hasan Afshar. Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian]
20. Gavahi, Abdolrahim (1379 SH). Daramadi bar Tarikh-e Adyan dar Qur'an. Tehran: Daftar Nashr-e Farhang-e Eslami. [In Persian]
21. Ibn Hisham, Abd al-Malik ibn Hisham (n.d.). Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah. Edited by Mustafa al-Saqqa, Ibrahim al-Abyari, and Abd al-Hafiz Shalabi. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah. [In Arabic]
22. Ibn Kathir, Abu al-Fida (1407/1986). Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. [In Arabic]
23. Ja'fari, Y. (n.d.). Kawthar. n.p.: n.p. [In Persian]
24. Khoshfar, M., Ikhtiyarian, P., & Hosseini, M. S. (1402 SH). “Tahlil-e Enteqadi-ye Ettiham-e Khoshunat be Payambar az Didgah-e Mostashreqan.” Qur'an Pazhuhi-ye Khavarshenasan. No 35. Spring. p70–140. [In Persian]
25. Makarem Shirazi, N., et al. (1374 SH). Tafsir-e Nemuneh. Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah. [In Persian]
26. Ma'rifat, M. H. (1391 SH). 'Ulum-e Qur'ani. Qom: Mu'assaseh-ye Farhangi Tamhid. [In Persian]
27. Moosa, Ebrahim(2010). The Changing Role of Islam in International Relations. No publisher specified.
28. Mostafavi, H. (1380 SH). Tafsir-e Roshan. Tehran: Markaz Nashr-e Ketab. [In Persian]
29. Motahhari, M. (1376 SH). Majmu'eh-ye Athar. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
30. Najafi, Mohammad Javad (1398 SH). Tafsir-e Asan. Tehran: Entesharat-e Eslamiyeh. [In Persian]
31. Qara'ati, M. (1383 SH). Tafsir-e Nur. Tehran: Markaz-e Farhangi Darsha'i az Qur'an. [In Persian]
32. Qurashi, S. A. A. (1377 SH). Tafsir-e Ahsan al-Hadith. Tehran: Bonyad-e Be'sat. [In Persian]
33. Sourabadi, A. B. 'A. ibn M. (1380 SH). Tafsir-e Surabadi. Tehran: Farhang-e No. [In Persian]
34. “Surat al-Nabi fi al-Khitab al-Istishraqi wa Atharuhu fi al-I'lam al-Gharbi” (2020). Salaf Center. [In Arabic]
35. Suleiman, O., & Al-Shannawi, M. (2020). “Kayfa Ta'ala al-Nabi 'an al-'Adawah wa al-Ihanah.” Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research. [In Arabic]
36. Tayyib, S. A. (1378 SH). Atyab al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an. Tehran: Entesharat-e Eslam. [In Persian]
37. The Holy Quran. Translated by Mohammad Mahdi Fooladvand.
38. Watt, W. M. (1390 SH). The Influence of Islam on Medieval Europe. Translated by Hossein Abdolmohammadi. Qom: Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute. [In Persian]
39. Watt, W. M. (1953). Muhammad at Mecca. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd ed.
40. Watt, W. M. (1956). Muhammad at Medina. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Watt, W. M. (1961). Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Zargari-Nejad, G. H. (1398 SH). Tarikh-e Sadr-e Islam (Asr-e Nubuwwat). Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tabesh Y, Dehghani F. Critique of the Claim of Duality in the Conduct of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in Mecca and Medina Based on a Revelation-Oriented Understanding of the Qur’an. islamhistory 2025; 1 (59) :5-8
URL: http://journal.isihistory.ir/article-1-1494-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 59 (autumn 2025) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش نامه تاریخ اسلام (فصلنامه انجمن ایرانی تاریخ اسلام) Quartely Research Journal of Islamic History
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4745